Passion for peace the social essays

Amongst other dictates, the Jedi Code forbade Jedi Knights and Jedi Masters from taking on more than one Padawan at a given time; [2] and forbade Jedi from forming attachments, such as marriage, [3] and other specific, individual bonds, such as family and romantic love. Few understood that this practice of nonattachment did not mean the Jedi were strangers to compassion when, in fact, they believed that all lives were precious. [4] The code also forbade the Jedi from killing unarmed opponents [5] as well as seeking revenge. [6]

The series was generally well received. The main review in The Guardian of the first episode was positive, remarking "you could watch The Passion and totally forget that this story was central to a major world religion. And that's a good thing, I think." [18] However, another article in the paper, discussing UK television over Easter 2008, called it "a dramatisation so conventional and reverent that the only harrumphing angle the papers have been able to find has been the position of the hands on the crucifix". [19] The Independent ' s Thomas Sutcliffe commented that "only the most zealously dogmatic Christian could complain that it was irreverent", [20] The Daily Telegraph ' s James Walton's review of the same episode praised the humanising of Pilate and Caiaphas, and felt Mawle's depiction of Jesus, despite not having the same "spell-binding effect as Robert Powell did in Jesus of Nazareth ", nevertheless was "more appealingly human". [21] Andrew Billen of The Times praised "some nice touches", but was overall more critical, calling Mawle's portrayal of Jesus too "meek, mild and hangdog". [22]

Passion for peace the social essays

passion for peace the social essays


passion for peace the social essayspassion for peace the social essayspassion for peace the social essayspassion for peace the social essays